 |
| |
|
Title of Thesis
Impact of Judicial Efficiency on Leverage and Debt-Maturity
Structure |
|
Author(s)
Attaullah Shah |
Institute/University/Department
Details Department Of Management Sciences Mohammad Ali
Jinnah University Islamabad |
Session 2010 |
Subject Finance |
Number of Pages 110 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and
abstract of thesis) Firm, Ratio, Structure,
Opportunities, Efficiency, Period, Effect, Features, Leverage,
Maturity, Debt, Judicial, Inefficient |
|
Abstract This dissertation
studies the impact of judicial efficiency on leverage and
debt-maturity structure of 370 firms that are listed on the Karachi
Stock Exchange, over the period 2001-2006.In a set of regressions
where dependent variable is leverage ratio, baseline results show
that leverage ratio increases with size of firm, ratio of
fixed-assets-to-totalassets,and decreases with profitability,
volatility of net income, dividends payments and growth
opportunities.The largest economic effect on leverage ratio is that
of the size of firm.These results demonstrate that the trade-off
theory and the information asymmetry theory best explains observed
capital structure.The results also indicate that leverage ratio
decreases when judicial efficiency decreases; however, this
relationship is not statistically significant.This is due to the
composition effect.Allowing judicial efficiency to interact with the
included explanatory variables, the results show that worsening
judicial efficiency increases leverage ratios of large firms and
decreases leverage ratios of
small firms which is an indication of the fact that creditors shift
credit away from small firms to large firms in the presence of
inefficient judicial system. Results also indicate that the effect
of inefficient courts is greater on leverage ratios of firms that
have fewer tangible assets as percentage of total assets than on
leverage ratios of firms that have more tangible assets.And finally
there is some evidence that firms with more volatile net incomes are
affected more than firms with less volatile net incomes when
judicial efficiency decreases.
In debt-maturity regressions, the baseline results indicate that
debt-maturity increases with size, tangible assets, and decreases
with the firm‘s growth opportunities and inefficiency of judiciary;
however, volatility of net income and firm‘s quality do not show any
statistically significant relationship with debt-maturity
ratio.Allowing for the possibility that judicial inefficiency does
not impact all firms alike, the measure of judicial efficiency is
interacted with dummy variables that are based on the quartiles of
the included explanatory variables. Results of these regressions
show that worsening judicial efficiency has far greater negative
impact on the debt-maturity ratio of small firms than on the
debt-maturity ratio of large firms.Similarly, results show that the
effect of inefficient courts is greater on firms that have fewer
tangible assets as percentage of total assets than on firms that
have more tangible assets. Other firm-specific features like growth
opportunities, volatility of net income, and firm‘s quality do not
change the impact of judicial inefficiency on the firms‘
debt-maturity ratios.
|
|