 |
| |
|
Title of Thesis
Developing a Framework for effective IT Project
Management and Best HR Practices |
|
Author(s)
S. M. IMRAN
HAIDER NAQVI |
Institute/University/Department
Details Faculty Of Advanced Integrated Studies And
Research (HRD) / National University Of Modern Languages, Islamabad |
Session 2009 |
Subject Human Resource Development |
Number of Pages 295 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and
abstract of thesis) Developing, Framework, effective,
IT, Project, Management, HR, Practices,
correlated, pragmatic, Industry, Practices |
|
Abstract The existing
framework of Project Management advises project managers to exercise
nine knowledge areas. These are management of the project’s Scope,
Time, Cost, Quality, HR, Communication, Procurement, Risk and
Integration. It suggests entertaining these nine knowledge areas in
five processes that are initiating, planning, executing, controlling
and closing the project. The knowledge on HR Management (HRM)
declares fourteen functions that this study identified applicable to
Project Management. The literature stresses that managing all these
knowledge areas determines project’s outcome. The literature further
indicates that nine knowledge areas are not equal in priority and
HRM is not given the needful precedence. The study perceived that it
is not pragmatic for a project manager to perform the nine knowledge
areas and all the applicable functions of HRM efficiently.
From Jan 2005 to Jan 2008, this study discovered that in the IT
industry of Islamabad – Rawalpindi, Pakistan, project managers were
assigned neither all the nine knowledge areas nor all the applicable
functions of HRM. The study observed that projects suffered where
HRM was underestimated. Can the quality in practice of HRM make or
break projects? If yes, what minimum functions of HRM should be
assigned to a project manager to benefit projects? Further, how can
the project manager’s role for precise number of knowledge areas be
defined? The study assumed that precise and well-defined role of a
project manager in terms of the nine knowledge areas and HRM can
make the existing framework for Project Management more adoptable.
For this purpose integrating the literature and the real practices
in the selected IT industry this study identified and selected five
HRM functions as independent variables (IVs) keeping project result
as dependent variable (DV). The IVs include selecting right person,
assigning workload, setting timelines, communication and monitoring
performance. This study hypothesized that the result of specific
IT/Telecom project is correlated with and regressed by the quality
in the practice of the mentioned HRM functions.
Utilizing a valid and reliable instrument the study collected data
for a stratified sample of 70 heterogeneous IT/Telecom projects from
the selected 24 IT/Telecom organizations. Employing frequency &
descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlations, regression and PLS
regression the analyses were conducted. All the selected IVs were
found correlated with project result. Individually no IV regressed
project result but collectively they all regressed the DV. The study
substantiated its hypotheses based on results of regression and PLS
regression. It inferred that good quality practice of all the
selected HR functions paves success for IT/Telecom project while
their substandard practice will lead project to suffering. The
conclusion of the study is applicable on the IT projects of large
scope and team size with well-defined type provided all the other
knowledge areas for project management are exercised with necessary
equilibrium. Based on results this study declares that a project
manager should perform at least these five functions of HRM. The
study designed templates to help project managers performing these
HR functions. The mentioned results and findings from the IT
industry about the knowledge areas enabled this study reshaping the
existing framework for Project Management. It contributes that
project manager better be set responsible only for the management of
scope, time, cost, HR and communication for projects while quality,
risk and procurement for projects better be managed at organization
level. Project manager should consider HRM, Communication and
technology the driving tools for managing other knowledge areas.
|
|