 |
| |
|
Title of Thesis
Bilingualism As Teaching Aid In A Language Class: L1 As A
Facilitator In Teaching/learning Process Of L2 At
Intermediate/certificate Level |
|
Author(s)
Muhammad Aslam
Sipra |
Institute/University/Department
Details Faculty Of Advanced Integrated Studies And
Research / National University Of Modern Languages, Islamabad |
Session 2009 |
Subject English |
Number of Pages 336 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and
abstract of thesis) Bilingualism, Teaching Aid, Language
Class,
Facilitator,
Teaching/learning, Intermediate/certificate, questionnaires,
language(s), monolingual teachers |
|
Abstract This study is an
investigation into the contribution of bilingualism to learning
English as a foreign language; and the limited and judicious use of
mother tongue in EFL classroom does not reduce students’
communicative ability but can assist in teaching learning process.
It proposes an explanation for this, based on the historical
development of bilingualism over time that has remained the dominant
practice in
English language classes in Pakistan. Moreover, it seeks to
understand whether teachers and the learners who do have another
language draw on it in ways relevant to the teaching of English, and
to suggest reasons why learners’ and teachers’ languages are
disregarded in the teaching and learning process. In doing so, the
dissertation draws on key bodies of literature in bilingualism,
second language acquisition and critical studies in an attempt to
provide a framework for considering the research questions. The
study employed a qualitative, interpretive research design involving
questionnaires, classroom observations and semi-structured
interviews. The data chapter analyzed the students and the teachers’
expressed responses and beliefs about the role of learners’ first
language(s) (L1) in the EFL class. The findings of the study in
general are that bilingualism as a resource in teaching aids and
facilitates in learning L2. There are differences between bilingual
and monolingual teachers in that the former have much richer
resources on which to draw. There are added insights which come from
circumstantial or elective bilingual experience, from being a
nonnative English speaker, and from formal and informal learning
experience. These propositions are discussed in the light of the
writings of critical theorists to give a wider perspective on
bilingualism as a teaching aid. It is suggested that bilingualism as
a teaching aid should become a legitimate topic for discussion and
further research.
|
|