| |
Title of Thesis
MEASURING COST EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN PAKISTAN 1991-2000 |
Author(s)
Ghulam Shabbir Khan Niazi |
Institute/University/Department Details
Department of Administrative Sciences/ Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad |
Session
2003 |
Subject
Administrative Sciences |
Number of Pages
176 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and abstract of thesis)
commercial banks, cost efficiency, productivity change, foreign banks, private banks, banking efficiency, malmquist productivity |
Abstract The banking sector in Pakistan experienced different reforms from time to time, but specially during 1990’s decade. This study explores the efficiency, performance and productivity growth of commercial banks in Pakistan over 1991-2000 period. After collection of data from the annual reports of the banks, input/output variables were defined under intermediation approach. The non-parametric model DEA was used to estimate the cost efficiency, allocative efficiency, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency scores of each bank. This model was employed separately on ownership (i.e. state-owned, private, and foreign) basis and on pooled sample data on year base. It was statistically justified the pooling of data of all commercial banks. The results of DEA model show that the commercial banks in Pakistan have to improve their efficiency, as their average cost efficiency score is very low from the world cost efficiency level. Results show that that the main source of inefficiency is the allocative inefficiency rather than the technical inefficiency, which is mainly due to the regularized banking sector in Pakistan. It is revealed that the foreign banks are the most efficient banks in Pakistan, while state-owned banks are the least efficient. The private banks are performing better than the state-owned banks. It is also found that the foreign banks are more scale efficient than their domestic counterparts. The majority of the domestic banks are over expanded. The parametric model results suggest that the inefficiency of the banking sector in Pakistan is due to managerial inefficiency rather than random error. Thus it indicates that the DEA results could be relied upon. Non-parametric Malmquist productivity index suggests that the productivity of commercial banks decreased by 1.8% per annum.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| S. No. |
Chapter |
Title of the Chapters |
Page |
Size (KB) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1 |
0 |
Contents |
|
 237.52 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 2 |
1 |
Introduction |
1 |
 157.11 KB |
| |
1.1 |
Background |
1 |
| |
1.2 |
Motivation For This Study |
21 |
| |
1.3 |
Specific Objectives Of The Study |
5 |
| |
1.4 |
Organization Of The Study |
6 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 3 |
2 |
Overview Of Banking Environment |
7 |
 544.41 KB |
| |
2.1 |
Background |
7 |
| |
2.2 |
Initial Phase Of Banking Sector Development, 1947-1973 |
|
| |
2.3 |
Banking Sector Reforms In 1970s |
11 |
| |
2.4 |
Banking Reforms In 1990s |
14 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 4 |
3 |
Literature Survey Of Banking Efficiency |
27 |
 926.06 KB |
| |
3.1 |
Introduction |
27 |
| |
3.2 |
The Econometric Approach |
30 |
| |
3.3 |
The Non-Parametric Approach |
35 |
| |
3.4 |
Malmquist Total Factor Productivity |
41 |
| |
3.5 |
Cross-Country Evidence On Banking Efficiency |
46 |
| |
3.6 |
Reviewing Empirical Evidence On Pakistan ’s Banking Industry |
48 |
| |
3.7 |
Defining Banking Inputs And Outputs |
54 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 |
4 |
Methodology |
59 |
 344.98 KB |
| |
4.1 |
A Graphical Exposition Of The Efficiency Measures |
59 |
| |
4.2 |
The Programming Approach: The DEA Frontier Model |
62 |
| |
4.3 |
The Econometric Approach: The Stochastic Frontier Model |
66 |
| |
4.4 |
Measuring Malmquist Productivity Index |
70 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 |
5 |
Banking Data And Construction Of Variables |
77 |
 401.37 KB |
| |
5.1 |
Introduction |
77 |
| |
5.2 |
Data Source |
78 |
| |
5.3 |
Construction Of Variables |
78 |
| |
5.4 |
Sample Statistics For Inputs, Outputs, And Prices Of Inputs |
80 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 7 |
6 |
Empirical Results Of Banking Efficiency |
89 |
 1376.79 KB |
| |
6.1 |
Common Across Time Vs. Separate Efficiency Frontier |
89 |
| |
6.2 |
Same Or Distinct Production Technology By Type Of Bank |
90 |
| |
6.3 |
Measuring Banking Efficiency By The DEA Approach |
94 |
| |
6.4 |
Stochastic Frontiers And Technical Efficiency Of Banks |
118 |
| |
6.5 |
Explaining Determinants Of Efficiency Of Commercial Banks |
123 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 8 |
7 |
Measuring Productivity Growth Of Commercial Banks In Pakistan |
142 |
 236.1 KB |
| |
7.1 |
Malmquist Productivity Index |
142 |
| |
7.2 |
Factors Explaining Productivity Change |
147 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 9 |
8 |
Summary And Conclusions |
153 |
 205.58 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 10 |
9 |
References |
161 |
 370.19 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 11 |
10 |
Appendix Tables |
170 |
 131.18 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |