| |
Title of Thesis
DESIGN – AND MODEL – BASED SAMPLING INFERENCE |
Author(s)
Muhammad Hanif Mian |
Institute/University/Department Details
University of the Punjab |
Session
1994 |
Subject
Statistics |
Number of Pages
260 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and abstract of thesis)
sampling, unequal probabilities, design and model based inference, estimator, design – based estimator, model-based variance estimator |
Abstract After describing the basic theory of design- and model-based sampling inference and literature review, the controversy between those who accept Royall's model-based (prediction approach) to inference in finite population sampling and those who continue to use the design-based (randomization) principle even after twenty four years with special reference to Neyman (1934) is discussed. While discussing the controversy, the author has presented his own point of view. A general estimator is introduced. The derivation of this estimator using a strictly design-based approach is given. Empirical and semi-empirical studies have been conducted to compare this new strictly design-based estimator with the existing design-based and model-based estimators. The design- and model-based properties of this general class of estimators have also been discussed. An anticipated variance (Isaki and Fuller, 1982) is derived. It is also proved that the asymptotic form of the estimator under investigation is the Generalized Regression of Cassel, Sarndal and Wretman (1976). The predictive form of this estimator, like Basu (1971), is, presented. An exact and approximate lower bound of the mean square of this general class of estimators is derived and compared with the Godambe Joshi (1965) lower bound of variance. For this purpose, a natural course of action is to limit the class of estimators which are design and model-unbiased. Within this class, we have found the optimum estimator and then derived the lower bound. An approximation to an exact lower bound of mean square error is derived by using Brewer's (1979) concept of asymptotic unbiased ness. A new model-based variance estimator is derived and compared with the existing design-based and model-based variance estimators. Some properties of the existing model-based estimators which remain unexplained so far are also discussed. Finally, a new selection procedure is introduced and using this selection procedure, the Generalized Murthy estimator (or revised ratio estimator) is de rived. The Generalized Murthy estimator is both design- and model-unbiased. A small sample performance of this new estimator is studied and it is found to be more stable than the Lahiri's (1951) ratio estimator, and it is as good as those of Horvitz and Thompson (1952) and Murthy (1957).
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| S. No. |
Chapter |
Title of the Chapters |
Page |
Size (KB) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1 |
0 |
Contents |
|
 109.78 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 2 |
1 |
Basic Theory And Survey Of Literature |
1 |
 483.97 KB |
| |
1.1 |
Introduction |
1 |
| |
1.2 |
Sampling With Unequal Probabilities |
3 |
| |
1.3 |
Basic Theory Of Design – And Model – Based Inference |
6 |
| |
1.4 |
Survey Of Literature |
21 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 3 |
2 |
Design – And Model-Based Sampling Inference |
46 |
 288.71 KB |
| |
2.1 |
Introduction |
46 |
| |
2.2 |
The Establishment Of Probability Sampling Paradigm By Neyman |
47 |
| |
2.3 |
Population Modeling |
53 |
| |
2.4 |
The Present Situation |
63 |
| |
2.5 |
Concluding Remarks |
70 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 4 |
3 |
A Design – Based Estimator For Unequal Probability Sampling |
72 |
 277.16 KB |
| |
3.1 |
Introduction |
72 |
| |
3.2 |
Derivation Of Estimator Using A Strictly Design – Based Approach |
77 |
| |
3.3 |
Unbiased Ness , Variance And Expected Variance Of The Design – Based Estimator |
81 |
| |
3.4 |
Semi And Empirical Studies |
84 |
| |
3.5 |
General Conclusion |
89 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 |
4 |
A Design – And Model-Based Estimator |
102 |
 101.56 KB |
| |
4.1 |
Introduction |
102 |
| |
4.2 |
Design – And Model-Based Estimator |
102 |
| |
4.3 |
Anticipated Variance Of Design-And Model-Unbiased Estimator (Y’s ) |
104 |
| |
4.4 |
Predictive From Of Estimator |
110 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 |
5 |
A Model-Based Variance Estimator |
113 |
 246.28 KB |
| |
5.1 |
Introduction |
113 |
| |
5.2 |
Some Useful New Results |
121 |
| |
5.3 |
A New Model-Based Variance Estimator |
128 |
| |
5.4 |
Empirical Studies |
130 |
| |
5.5 |
General Conclusion |
133 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 7 |
6 |
Design – And Model Revised Ratio Estimator |
140 |
 157.39 KB |
| |
6.1 |
Introduction |
140 |
| |
6.2 |
The Class Of Generalized Murthy Estimator |
143 |
| |
6.3 |
The New Selection Procedure |
144 |
| |
6.4 |
The Revised Ratio Estimator |
146 |
| |
6.5 |
Small Sample Performance Of The Revised Ratio Estimator |
149 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 8 |
7 |
Lower Bound To Mean Square Error Of An Estimator |
157 |
 755.84 KB |
| |
7.1 |
Introduction |
157 |
| |
7.2 |
A Design –And Model-Unbiased Estimator |
160 |
| |
7.3 |
An Approximation To The Lower Bound |
167 |
| |
7.4 |
Numerical Comparison |
170 |
| |
7.5 |
References |
187 |
| |
7.6 |
Appendix-1: Derivation Of Formula For Σ n j±1 1j When The Sample Size Is A Random Variable |
204 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |