| |
Title of Thesis
A STUDY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCHOOL HEADS MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES WITH SCHOOL EFFECTIVE NESS AND DESIGNING OF AN IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL HEADS IN PAKISTAN |
Author(s)
Ghazala Noureen |
Institute/University/Department Details
Institute of Education and Research University of the Punjab, Lahore |
Session
2003 |
Subject
Education |
Number of Pages
202 |
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and abstract of thesis)
SCHOOL HEADS MANAGEMENT, SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS, IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAMME, SECONDARY SCHOOL HEADS, management |
Abstract The study was designed to explore the relationship between management competencies of school heads with school effectiveness and designing of in-service training programme for school heads. Objectives of the study revolved around the most important and key figure in the school that is the school head. No school will operate long without a competent head, because he/she is person who can make a school successful enterprise. Effective school heads are not necessarily born with skills and traits. They can be trained for performing certain management roles. Te present study was conducted as a field study was conducted as a field study where in data of high effective and low effective schools were to be collected, analyzed and compared to identify the relationship between management competencies of school heads with school effectiveness. Five identified management competencies (technical knowledge, morale, judgment. Occupational knowledge and manipulative skills) were measured and explored their relationship with school effectiveness. The study also sought to establish the relationship the relationship between personal and situational factors such as gender of the school heads, management courses attended by school heads and management experience of school heads management courses attended by school heads and management experience of school heads with school effectiveness and management competencies of school heads. These personal and situational factors were analyzed through twenty hypotheses to assess their contribution in explaining school effectiveness and management competencies of school heads. Heads Competencies Assessment Scale (HCAS) is developed and validated to measure the management competencies of school heads. School Effectiveness Measuring Questionnaire (SEMQ) is developed to measure school effectiveness. Sample of the study was comprised of 250 school heads and 1000 teachers. Usable data were received from 200 school heads and 800 teachers. Parametric statistical techniques were used to analyze the data. The conclusions based on descriptive and statistical evidences of this study indicates that significant relationship exists between management competencies of school heads and school effectiveness. All five management competencies (technical knowledge, morale, judgment. Occupational knowledge and manipulative skills) discriminated between high effective and low effective schools. Morale, judgment and occupational knowledge are competencies which highly discriminated between high effective and low effective schools. So it can be concluded from the findings of study that management competencies of school heads are directly related to school effectiveness. In addition this study described that gender of the heads did no affect the school effectiveness, while professional qualification of school heads and management courses attended by school heads were more supportive for school effectiveness. Keeping in view the findings of the study in-service training programme is designed for school heads. This in-service training programme included objectives of programme, content for management training, training methodologies, evaluation procedure and tentative schedule of training programme.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| S. No. |
Chapter |
Title of the Chapters |
Page |
Size (KB) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1 |
0 |
Contents |
|
 114.34 KB |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 2 |
1 |
Introduction |
1 |
 99.21 KB |
| |
1.1 |
Statement Of The Problem |
5 |
| |
1.2 |
Significance Of The Study |
5 |
| |
1.3 |
Theoretical Foundation |
7 |
| |
1.4 |
Objectives Of The Study |
10 |
| |
1.5 |
Assumptions Of The Study |
10 |
| |
1.6 |
General Procedure Of The Study |
10 |
| |
1.7 |
Limitations Of Study |
10 |
| |
1.8 |
Definitions Of The Terms Used |
12 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 3 |
2 |
Review Of Related Literature |
13 |
 641.71 KB |
| |
2.1 |
What Is Management |
13 |
| |
2.2 |
Emergence Of Management |
14 |
| |
2.3 |
Approaches Of Management |
15 |
| |
2.4 |
The Classical Approach To Management |
15 |
| |
2.5 |
The Behavioral Approach Of Management |
17 |
| |
2.6 |
The Quantitative Approach |
17 |
| |
2.8 |
The System Approach |
18 |
| |
2.9 |
Situational Management Theory |
19 |
| |
2.10 |
Management Competencies |
21 |
| |
2.11 |
Islamic View Point Competencies |
25 |
| |
2.12 |
Competencies Of School Heads |
26 |
| |
2.13 |
Research On Competencies Of School Heads |
37 |
| |
2.14 |
School Effectiveness |
49 |
| |
2.15 |
Approaches Of Effectiveness |
50 |
| |
2.16 |
Goal Approach Of Effectiveness |
50 |
| |
2.17 |
System Resource Approach Of Effectiveness |
51 |
| |
2.18 |
School Effectiveness Models |
51 |
| |
2.19 |
Research On School Effectiveness |
52 |
| |
2.20 |
Indicators Of School Effectiveness |
53 |
| |
2.21 |
Common Issues In Competency And School Effectiveness |
59 |
| |
2.22 |
In-Service Training |
63 |
| |
2.23 |
Functions Of Staff Development |
68 |
| |
2.24 |
Problems Of In-Service Training In Pakistan |
74 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 4 |
3 |
Research Design And Procedures |
75 |
 109.82 KB |
| |
3.1 |
Null Hypotheses |
75 |
| |
3.2 |
Sources Of Data |
77 |
| |
3.3 |
Sample F The Study |
78 |
| |
3.4 |
Rational For Sample |
78 |
| |
3.5 |
Instrumentation |
78 |
| |
3.6 |
Heads Competencies Assessment Scale |
79 |
| |
3.7 |
Heads Competencies Assessment Scale For Teachers |
80 |
| |
3.8 |
Heads Competencies Assessment Scale For Heads |
81 |
| |
3.9 |
School Effectiveness Measuring Questionnaire |
81 |
| |
3.10 |
Reliability And Validity Checks Of Measuring Instruments |
82 |
| |
3.11 |
Reliability Check: ( Hcas ) |
82 |
| |
3.12 |
First Pilot Run: ( Hcas ) |
82 |
| |
3.13 |
Second Pilot Run: ( Hcas ) |
82 |
| |
3.14 |
Validity Checks |
83 |
| |
3.15 |
First Pilot Run: ( Hcas ) |
83 |
| |
3.16 |
Second Pilot Run: ( Hcas ) |
83 |
| |
3.17 |
School Effectiveness Measuring Questionnaire |
83 |
| |
3.18 |
Validity Check : ( Semq ) |
83 |
| |
3.19 |
Reliability Check: ( Semq ) |
83 |
| |
3.20 |
Descriptions Of Data Gathering |
84 |
| |
3.21 |
Research Design |
84 |
| |
3.22 |
Statistical Analysis |
84 |
| |
3.23 |
Nature Of Variables And Scale |
84 |
| |
3.24 |
Treatment Of Data |
85 |
| |
3.25 |
Statistical Significance |
85 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 |
4 |
Analysis Of Data |
86 |
 515.94 KB |
| |
4.1 |
Participation Rates And Demographic Variables |
88 |
| |
4.2 |
Demographic Variables And School Effectiveness |
92 |
| |
4.3 |
Demographic Variables And Management Competencies Of School Heads |
95 |
| |
4.4 |
Significance Of Difference Between High Effective And Low Effective Schools On The Basic Of Management Competencies |
98 |
| |
4.5 |
Testing Of Null Hypotheses |
101 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 |
5 |
Summary, Findings, Conclusion And Recommendation |
115 |
 756.29 KB |
| |
5.1 |
Summary |
115 |
| |
5.2 |
Findings |
199 |
| |
5.3 |
Findings From Descriptive Data |
119 |
| |
5.4 |
Conclusions Drawn From Descriptive Data |
121 |
| |
5.5 |
Statistical Findings |
122 |
| |
5.6 |
Conclusions Drawn From Statistical Findings |
127 |
| |
5.7 |
Discussion Of Findings |
129 |
| |
5.8 |
Recommendations |
132 |
| |
5.9 |
Recommendations For Future Research |
133 |
| |
5.10 |
Proposed In-Service Training Program For Secondary School Head |
134 |
| |
5.11 |
References |
153 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |