I= WEED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN DIRECT WET-SEEDED RICE CULTURE UNDER THE AGROECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF D.I KHAN –PAKISTAN
Pakistan Research Repository Home
 

Title of Thesis
WEED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN DIRECT WET-SEEDED RICE CULTURE UNDER THE AGROECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF D.I KHAN –PAKISTAN

Author(s)
Khizar Hayat
Institute/University/Department Details
Faculty Of Agriculture/ Gomal University, D. I. Khan
Session
2004
Subject
Agronomy
Number of Pages
259
Keywords (Extracted from title, table of contents and abstract of thesis)
weed management, wet-seeded rice culture, agroecological conditions, weed flora, herbicides, direct seeding culture, integrated weed management (iwm), insect control, weed diversity

Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Agricultural Research Institute Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan during 1999 and 2000, to develop a viable and economically feasible weed management technology for the farmers of the area. The objective of this study was to establish an appropriate Weed management Strategy for effective control of weed flora in direct wet seeded rice.

The experiments were conducted using split-plot arrangements in a Randomized Complete Block Design with a sub-plot size of 5m x 3m having three replications, during both years. The first experiment included IR-6, IR-9 and KS-282 varieties in main plots seeded on five different dates in sub-plots. The seeding was done from May 9 to June 18 at 10-day interval, during both the years. The results revealed that seeding of KS-282 on June 18 resulted in significantly lower weed population (m-2) low dry weed biomass (g m-2), greater number of spikelets per panicle, more l000-grain weight (g), higher net income and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) values. However, June 18 seeding was at par with June 8 for number of panicles (m-2), number of days to maturity, paddy and straw yield (t ha-1). Besides, June 8 seeding had lower sterility percentage and greater number of tillers(m-2 ). The second trial consisted of three seeding rates of 60, 90 and 120 kg ha-l, in main plots, and oxadiazon (Rostar 12 L) @ 0.240 kg a.i, oxadiargyl (Topstar) 0.80 kg a.i, pretilachlor (Rifit) 0.50 kg a.i. and acetachlor (Acelor) 0.125 kg a.i. ha-1 in the sub-plots and were applied at post-emergence stage. Weedy check was also included in the trial. Both the pretilachlor and acetachlor application proved their efficacy against the grasses . and sedges and improved yield parameters, increased net return and BCR values over other herbicides and weedy check.- when 120 kg ha-1 seed rate was used. In the third experiment, four above mentioned herbicides including a weedy check plot were kept in sub-plots, while herbicides application intervals of 3, 6 and 9 weeks after seeding (WAS), were assigned to main plots. Pretilachlor application showed its superiority in terms of higher paddy and straw yield (ha-1), number of panicles m-2, number of spikelets panicle-1 1000-grain weight (g), lower dry weed biomass (g m-2) and sterility%, higher net income and BCR values when applied 3 WAS. While, averaging over the intervals of herbicides application, oxadiargyl was at par with pretilachlor for weed population (m-2), plant height (cm), tillers m-2, spikelets panicle-1, 1000-grain weight (g) and straw yield (t ha-1). However, these herbicides were statistically similar for paddy yield (t ha-1 harvest index, and number of panicles (m-2) during the second year of the trial. Oxadiargyl also resulted higher BCR values when applied 9 WAS. Oxadiargyl, pretilachlor and acetachlor controlled the sedges to the extent of90. 7% and grasses to the tune of 86.3- 86.7% when applied 3 WAS. In the fourth experiment; IR-6, IR-9 and KS-282 of the coarse group and Basmati-385, Basmati-370 and Basmati-198 from the fine group of rice varieties; assigned to the sub-plots were treated with acetachlor @ 0.125 kg a.i. and pretilachlor 0.50 kg a.i.ha-1, that were placed in main plots. Weedy check plot was also planted for comparison. Coarse and fine rice varieties responded well to herbicide application and had lower weed population (m-2) and dry weed biomass (g m-2) than weedy check. Acetachlor application to KS-282 gave numerically less dry weed biomass. Fine rice varieties produced significantly less dry weed biomass than coarse varieties but were at par with each other for both these parameters. Coarse variety KS-282 produced the maximum number of tillers and panicles (m-2), lower sterility%, more 1000-grain weight (g), paddy and straw yield (t ha-1) and harvest index, and were statistically at par with those recorded for IR-6. Variety IR-9 was the most early- maturing, while tallest plants were produced by Basmati-198; whereas the maximum spikelets per panicle were recoded for Basmati-370. Acetachor application resulted in the highest net return and BCR values in Basmati-198 during the first year while, during the second year KS-282 gave higher BCR value. Pretilachlor when applied to Basmati-198 gave the highest net income and BCR during both the years. While, in the fifth experiment, Clamazone @ 0.247 kg a.i.ha-1, in addition to all the previously used four herbicides and the weedy check was tested in sub-plots. The main plots comprised hand weeding 6 and 9 WAS or no weeding. In the last experiment, pretilachlor, clamazone and acetachlor when followed one hand weeding each 6 and 9 WAS resulted in increased paddy and straw yield (t ha-1), harvest index; minimum weed population (m-2), dry weed biomass (g m-2), and lower sterility percentage than oxaziazon and oxadiargyl and the weedy check, though these three herbicides were statistically at par with each other for these parameters. However, numerically higher values for all the parameters were recorded for the pretilachlor application. The interaction of pretilachlor herbicide with hand weeding 6 WAS produced the maximum paddy yield. Higher BCR value was observed for acetachlor application with no hand weeding (herbicide alone), but pretilachlor gave higher BCR when supplemented with hand weeding 6 and 9 WAS. Pretilachlor application followed by one hand weeding at 6 WAS gave the excellent control of grasses and sedges. It is concluded from the research that direct seeding of course varieties of rice during the 2nd week of June at 120 kg ha-1 seed rate, pretilachlor application @ 0.240 kg a.i. ha-1 3 WAS and combined with hand weeding 6 WAS is the best strategy for higher grain yield of rice in the area.

Download Full Thesis
2893.37 KB
S. No. Chapter Title of the Chapters Page Size (KB)
1 0 Contents
245.32 KB
2 1 Introduction 1
60.55 KB
3 2 Review of literature 6
373.94 KB
  2.1 Rice planting 6
  2.2 Direct seeding culture 6
  2.3 Varieties 7
  2.4 Seed Rates 8
  2.5 Planting time 10
  2.6 Planting Methods 11
  2.7 Weed Management 14
  2.8 Chemical Control 15
  2.9 Chemical versus Manual weed control 22
  2.10 Different times of chemical and manual weed 27
  2.11 Integrated weed management (IWM) 27
4 3 Materials and methods 33
113.96 KB
  3.1 Location and agro-meteorological conditions 33
  3.2 Soil type and preceding corps 33
  3.3 Loan preparation and fertilizer application 33
  3.4 Seed rate and treatment 34
  3.5 Water management 35
  3.6 Varieties and seeding 35
  3.7 Layout and design 35
  3.8 Statistical analysis 35
  3.9 Insect Control 36
  3.10 Weed Sampling 36
  3.11 Observation Recorded 36
  3.12 Weed Diversity (Relative Density % of Total ) 37
  3.13 Plant Height at Maturity( cm) 37
  3.14 Days to 50% Flowering 37
  3.15 Number of tillers (m - 2 ) 38
  3.16 Number of Panicles (m -2 ) 38
  3.17 Number of spikelets per panicle 38
  3.18 Sterility percentage 38
  3.19 1000-Grain weight( g) 38
  3.20 Paddy yield (t ha -1 ) 39
  3.21 Straw yield( t ha -1 ) 39
  3.22 Harvest index 39
  3.23 Economic analysis 39
  3.24 Benefit cost ratio( BCR) 39
  3.25 Application of herbicides 40
  3.26 Observation recorded 40
  3.27 Application of herbicides 41
  3.28 Weed sampling 41
  3.29 Effectiveness percentage of herbicides 41
  3.30 Observation recorded 41
  3.31 Varieties 42
  3.32 Observation recorded 42
  3.33 Hand weeding 42
  3.34 Weed sampling 43
  3.35 Observations recorded 43
5 4 Results and discussions 44
1910.32 KB
  4.1 Experiment No.1: Weed growth as affected by different varieties and dates of seeding and their effect on yield and yield components of direct wet-seeded rice 44
  4.2 Experiment No.2: Effect of different seeding rates and herbicides application on weed dynamics and yield and yield components of direct wet-seeded rice 78
  4.3 Experiment No.3: Effect of times of application of herbicides on biomass of grasses and sedges and their effect on yield and yield components of direct wet-seeded rice 115
  4.4 Experiment No.4: Effect of different varieties and herbicide application on suppression of weeds and yield and yield components of direct wet-seeded rice 152
  4.5 Experiment No.5: Studies on integration of chemical and manual weed control and its effect on yield and yield components of direct wet-seeded rice 181
6 5 Summary 212
39.89 KB
7 6 Conclusion and recommendations 215
27.94 KB
8 7 Literature cited 217
191.67 KB
9 8 Appendices 233
254.42 KB